| Surfactant-Enhanced
Bioremediation of Soils in the Presence of an Organic Phase: Peter R. Jaffé, Princeton University . |
Goal: |
Recent work has shown that low-solubility contaminants solubilized into the micellar phase of some non-ionic surfactants are directly available for biodegradation, meaning that the contaminant can be transferred directly from the core of the micelle to cell without having to transfer to the water phase first. This makes surfactant-enhanced remediation an attractive technology for sites that contain large amounts of low-solubility organic contaminants such as coal tars. Several crucial interactions need to be understood in order to extrapolate these laboratory results to field-scale surfactant enhanced bioremediation schemes. This research focuses on the following:
|
||
Rationale: |
Biodegradation of PAH’s can be monitored in batch experiments in the presence of varying surfactant doses. If the degree of partitioning of the substrate into a micelle is known from separate experiments, then simulation of these degradation experiments allows estimating the rate at which the micellar-phase substrate is being degraded. These measurements/simulations can be repeated for different surfactant doses and substrate combinations to assess the effect of both on the degradation rate. |
||
Approach: |
|
||
Status: |
The multicomponent PAH degradation in the presence of surfactants has been completed during the first year of this project. A set of experiments to study the effect of surfactants on the attachment of bacteria to NAPL surfaces in batch and column experiments is being completed during the second year of the project. |
||
Technology Transfer and Outreach Plan: |
Results of this research were transferred to users using three different approaches: (1) publications in journals that have a wide circulation amongst practitioners and scientists; (2) presentations in conferences, and (3) presentations to selected industrial groups from the chemical and petrochemical manufacturing sector, e.g., meetings with representatives from the environmental divisions at Shell, Exxon, Phillips Petroleum, and DuPont. |
||